10-Q: Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)]
Published on August 9, 2005
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10 – Q
| þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
OR
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-29440
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
| DELAWARE (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) |
77-0444317 (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER) |
466 Kato Terrace, Fremont, CA 94539
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES INCLUDING ZIP CODE)
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES INCLUDING ZIP CODE)
(510) 360-2300
(REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)
(REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)
(FORMER NAME, FORMER ADDRESS AND FORMER FISCAL YEAR, IF CHANGED SINCE LAST REPORT)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes þ No o
At August 3, 2005, 15,542,260 shares of common stock were outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 10,241 | $ | 11,511 | $ | 21,023 | $ | 24,741 | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
6,984 | 9,793 | 14,132 | 17,618 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
3,257 | 1,718 | 6,891 | 7,123 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
2,276 | 2,797 | 4,725 | 5,553 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
2,629 | 3,054 | 5,064 | 6,372 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,288 | 2,949 | 4,759 | 5,774 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
174 | 290 | 350 | 593 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and other charges (credits) |
(26 | ) | (149 | ) | 163 | (58 | ) | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
7,341 | 8,941 | 15,061 | 18,234 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(4,084 | ) | (7,223 | ) | (8,170 | ) | (11,111 | ) | ||||||||
Interest and other income |
517 | 374 | 1,676 | 773 | ||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(3,567 | ) | (6,849 | ) | (6,494 | ) | (10,338 | ) | ||||||||
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
90 | (10 | ) | 177 | (126 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(3,477 | ) | (6,859 | ) | (6,317 | ) | (10,464 | ) | ||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
(133 | ) | (79 | ) | (269 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
(40 | ) | (35 | ) | 15 | 62 | ||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (3,650 | ) | $ | (6,973 | ) | $ | (6,571 | ) | $ | (10,510 | ) | ||||
Loss per share from continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted |
$ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | (0.41 | ) | $ | (0.68 | ) | ||||
Loss per share from discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted |
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | ||||
Net loss per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted |
$ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) | $ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.68 | ) | ||||
Shares used to compute basic and diluted loss per share |
15,522 | 15,392 | 15,504 | 15,359 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (3,650 | ) | $ | (6,973 | ) | $ | (6,571 | ) | $ | (10,510 | ) | ||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
313 | (75 | ) | 209 | (78 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(907 | ) | (218 | ) | (1,877 | ) | (356 | ) | ||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
$ | (4,244 | ) | $ | (7,266 | ) | $ | (8,239 | ) | $ | (10,944 | ) | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value)
(unaudited)
| June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 15,749 | $ | 31,181 | ||||
Short-term investments |
20,598 | 14,972 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,796 and $2,207 as of
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
6,446 | 8,700 | ||||||
Inventories |
6,133 | 8,319 | ||||||
Other current assets |
2,396 | 2,336 | ||||||
Total current assets |
51,322 | 65,508 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
3,770 | 4,597 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
1,222 | 1,740 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,451 | 1,462 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 57,765 | $ | 73,307 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,613 | $ | 4,790 | ||||
Accrued compensation and related benefits |
2,523 | 2,670 | ||||||
Accrued restructuring and other charges |
4,069 | 9,879 | ||||||
Accrued professional fees |
1,494 | 2,011 | ||||||
Accrued royalties |
1,215 | 1,794 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
2,985 | 3,189 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
2,015 | 2,014 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
18,914 | 26,347 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability |
103 | 131 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 10 and 12) |
— | — | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 40,000 shares authorized; 15,542
and 15,484 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively |
16 | 15 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
227,555 | 227,398 | ||||||
Treasury stock |
(2,777 | ) | (2,777 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit |
(186,892 | ) | (180,321 | ) | ||||
Other cumulative comprehensive gain |
846 | 2,514 | ||||||
Total stockholders’ equity |
38,748 | 46,829 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 57,765 | $ | 73,307 | ||||
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
| Six Months | ||||||||
| Ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (6,571 | ) | $ | (10,510 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities: |
||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
254 | 46 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,177 | 1,768 | ||||||
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets |
(2 | ) | 2 | |||||
Stock compensation expense |
— | 22 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(28 | ) | — | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
1,828 | 2,230 | ||||||
Inventories |
2,005 | (1,524 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
(218 | ) | 5,734 | |||||
Accounts payable |
83 | (1,876 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses |
(5,991 | ) | 584 | |||||
Income taxes payable |
1 | (467 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations |
(7,462 | ) | (3,991 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations |
(1,059 | ) | (600 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(8,521 | ) | (4,591 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(65 | ) | (245 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets |
76 | — | ||||||
Maturities of short-term investments |
4,704 | 2,692 | ||||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
(10,338 | ) | (3,041 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations |
(5,623 | ) | (594 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities from discontinued operations |
2 | — | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(5,621 | ) | (594 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of equity securities, net |
158 | 600 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
158 | 600 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
(1,448 | ) | (655 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(15,432 | ) | (5,240 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
31,181 | 49,382 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 15,749 | $ | 44,142 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Income tax refunds received |
$ | 96 | $ | — | ||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 8 | $ | 50 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2005
JUNE 30, 2005
| 1. | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulations
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2005. For further information, refer to the financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in SCM Microsystems’ (“SCM” or “the Company”) Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123R is a revision
of SFAS No. 123 and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion 25. SFAS No. 123R
eliminates the alternative of applying the intrinsic value measurement provisions of APB Opinion 25
to stock compensation awards issued to employees. Rather, the new standard requires enterprises to
measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based
on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during
which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite
service period (usually the vesting period).
The Company has not yet quantified the effects of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, but it is
expected that the new standard may result in significant stock-based compensation expense. The
actual effects of adopting SFAS No. 123R will be dependent on numerous factors including, but not
limited to, the valuation model chosen by the Company to value stock-based awards; the assumed
award forfeiture rate; the accounting policies adopted concerning the method of recognizing the
fair value of awards over the requisite service period; and the transition method (as described
below) chosen for adopting SFAS No. 123R.
As a result of the decision by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to
delay its effective date, SFAS No. 123R will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123R requires the use of the Modified Prospective Application Method.
Under this method SFAS No. 123R is applied to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or
cancelled after the effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards for
which the requisite service has not been rendered (such as unvested options) that are outstanding
as of the date of adoption shall be recognized as the remaining services are rendered. The
compensation cost relating to unvested awards at the date of adoption shall be based on the
grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro forma disclosures under the original
SFAS No. 123. In addition, companies may use the Modified Retrospective Application Method. This
method may be applied to all prior years for which the original SFAS No. 123 was effective or only
to prior interim periods in the year of initial adoption. If the Modified Retrospective
Application Method is applied, financial statements for prior periods shall be adjusted to give
effect to the fair-value-based method of accounting for awards on a consistent basis with the pro
forma disclosures required for those periods under the original SFAS No. 123.
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of
APB Opinion 29. SFAS No. 153 eliminates certain differences between existing accounting standards.
This standard is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning
after June, 15, 2005. The Company does not expect adoption of this standard to have a material
impact on its future results of operations and financial position.
In November 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs. SFAS No. 151 clarifies the
accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted
material (spoilage). SFAS No. 151 requires that these items be recognized as current period
charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to
inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Unallocated overheads must be
recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. SFAS No. 151 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of
the new standard on its future results of operations and financial position.
5
Table of Contents
In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on Issue No.
03-01, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments
(“EITF No. 03-01”). EITF No. 03-01 provides guidance on recording other-than-temporary impairments
of cost method investments and disclosures about unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt and
equity securities accounted for under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities. The guidance for evaluating whether an investment is other-than-temporarily
impaired should be applied in other-than-temporary impairment evaluations made in reporting periods
beginning after June 15, 2004. The additional disclosures for cost method investments are effective
for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. For investments accounted for under SFAS No. 115, the
disclosures are effective in annual financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2003. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
balance sheet or statement of operations.
2. Stock Based Compensation
Pending the effective date of SFAS No. 123R, the Company accounts for its employee stock
option plan in accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion No.
25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for
Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation (“FIN No. 44”). Accordingly, no compensation is
recognized for employee stock options granted with exercise prices greater than or equal to the
fair value of the underlying common stock at date of grant. If the exercise price is less than the
market value at the date of grant, the difference is recognized as deferred compensation expense,
which is amortized over the vesting period of the options. The Company accounts for stock options
issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and EITF Issue No. 96-18 under the fair value based method.
For purposes of pro forma disclosure under SFAS No. 123, the estimated fair value of the
options is assumed to be amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period, using the multiple
option method. Pro forma information is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
| Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
Net loss, as reported |
$ | (3,650 | ) | $ | (6,973 | ) | $ | (6,571 | ) | $ | (10,510 | ) | ||||
Add: Employee stock-based compensation included in reported
net loss net of related tax effects |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Less: Stock-based compensation expense determined under
fair value method for all awards |
(402 | ) | (884 | ) | (839 | ) | (1,589 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net loss |
$ | (4,052 | ) | $ | (7,857 | ) | $ | (7,410 | ) | $ | (12,099 | ) | ||||
Net loss per share, as reported — basic and diluted |
$ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) | $ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.68 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net loss per share — basic and diluted |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.51 | ) | $ | (0.48 | ) | $ | (0.79 | ) | ||||
3. Discontinued Operations
During 2003, the Company completed two transactions to sell its retail Digital Media and
Video business. On July 25, 2003, the Company completed the sale of its digital video business to
Pinnacle Systems and on August 1, 2003, the Company completed the sale of its retail digital media
reader business to Zio Corporation. As a result of these sales, the Company has accounted for the
retail Digital Media and Video business as a discontinued operation.
6
Table of Contents
The operating results for the discontinued operations of the retail Digital Media and Video
business for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and during the same periods for 2004 are
as follows (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 16 | ||||||||
Operating loss |
$ | (79 | ) | $ | (68 | ) | $ | (185 | ) | $ | (131 | ) | ||||
Net loss before income taxes |
$ | (133 | ) | $ | (79 | ) | $ | (269 | ) | $ | (108 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit (provision) |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
$ | (133 | ) | $ | (79 | ) | $ | (269 | ) | $ | (108 | ) | ||||
| 4. | Short-Term Investments |
The fair value of short-term investments at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was as
follows (in thousands):
| June 30, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gain on | Loss on | Fair | |||||||||||||
| Cost | Investments | Investments | Value | |||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
$ | 9,952 | $ | — | $ | (57 | ) | $ | 9,895 | |||||||
U.S. government agencies |
10,745 | — | (42 | ) | 10,703 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,697 | $ | — | $ | (99 | ) | $ | 20,598 | |||||||
| December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gain on | Loss on | Fair | |||||||||||||
| Cost | Investments | Investments | Value | |||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
$ | 10,286 | $ | — | $ | (276 | ) | $ | 10,010 | |||||||
U.S. government agencies |
4,994 | — | (32 | ) | 4,962 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 15,280 | $ | — | $ | (308 | ) | $ | 14,972 | |||||||
During each quarter, SCM evaluates investments for possible asset impairment by examining a
number of factors, including the current economic conditions and markets for each investment, as
well as its cash position and anticipated cash needs for the short and long term. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, no impairment of the investments was identified based on
the evaluations performed.
7
Table of Contents
| 5. | Inventories |
Inventories consist of (in thousands):
| June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 2,978 | $ | 4,604 | ||||
Work in process |
1,746 | 1,152 | ||||||
Finished goods |
1,409 | 2,563 | ||||||
| $ | 6,133 | $ | 8,319 | |||||
| 6. | Intangible Assets |
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
| June 30, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Accumulated | Impairment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Period | Value | Amortization | Net | Value | Amortization | Loss | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer relations |
60 months |
$ | 1,506 | $ | (938 | ) | $ | 568 | $ | 1,937 | $ | (1,086 | ) | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 807 | ||||||||||||||
Core technology |
60 months |
1,707 | (1,053 | ) | 654 | 3,984 | (2,707 | ) | (344 | ) | 933 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets |
$ | 3,213 | $ | (1,991 | ) | $ | 1,222 | $ | 5,921 | $ | (3,793 | ) | $ | (388 | ) | $ | 1,740 | |||||||||||||||
SCM evaluates long-lived assets under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, only SCM’s, intangible assets
relating to core technology and customer relations are subject to amortization. Amortization
expense related to intangible assets was $0.4 million for the first six months of 2005 and $0.6
million for the same period of 2004.
Estimated future amortization of intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):
| Fiscal Year | Amount | |||||
2005 (remaining 6 months) |
$ | 320 | ||||
2006 |
637 | |||||
2007 |
265 | |||||
Total |
$ | 1,222 | ||||
| 7. | Restructuring and Other Charges |
Continuing Operations
In the first six months of 2005 and 2004, SCM incurred net restructuring and other charges
(credits) related to continuing operations of approximately $0.2 million and $(0.1) million,
respectively.
Accrued liabilities related to restructuring actions and other activities during the first two
quarters of 2005 and during the year ended December 31, 2004 consist of the following (in
thousands):
8
Table of Contents
| Asset | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Legal | Lease/Contract | Write | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Settlements | Commitments | Downs | Severance | Costs | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of January 1, 2004 |
$ | — | $ | 124 | $ | 49 | $ | 114 | $ | 6,807 | $ | 7,094 | ||||||||||||
Provision for 2004 |
620 | 9 | 17 | 831 | 106 | 1,583 | ||||||||||||||||||
Changes in estimates |
(19 | ) | 20 | (20 | ) | (6 | ) | (1,741 | ) | (1,766 | ) | |||||||||||||
| 601 | 29 | (3 | ) | 825 | (1,635 | ) | (183 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Payments or write offs in 2004 |
(601 | ) | (101 | ) | (46 | ) | (508 | ) | (40 | ) | (1,296 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2004 |
— | 52 | — | 431 | 5,132 | 5,615 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for Q1 2005 |
1 | — | — | 16 | 9 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Changes in estimates |
— | 7 | — | (15 | ) | 170 | 162 | |||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 7 | — | 1 | 179 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||
Payments or write offs in Q1 2005 |
(1 | ) | (8 | ) | — | (339 | ) | (302 | ) | (650 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balances as of March 31, 2005 |
— | 51 | — | 93 | 5,009 | 5,153 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for Q2 2005 |
— | — | — | — | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Changes in estimates |
— | — | — | 3 | (41 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| — | — | — | 3 | (29 | ) | (26 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Payments or write offs in Q2 2005 |
— | (8 | ) | — | (96 | ) | (4,671 | ) | (4,775 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balances as of June 30, 2005 |
$ | — | $ | 43 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 309 | $ | 352 | ||||||||||||
For the three and six months ended June 2005, restructuring and other charges primarily
related to changes in estimates for European tax related matters and lease commitments, which were
partially offset by changes in estimates related to severance costs in connection with cost
reduction actions taken by management in 2004. As of June 30, 2005, these cost reduction actions
have been completed and the Company does not expect to incur further charges in 2005 related to
these actions. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company made a payment to the French government of
approximately $4.7 million related to Value Added Tax (“VAT”) in respect of sales transactions with a
former customer. In connection with this payment, the Company entered
into an agreement with the customer to seek a refund from the French
government for the VAT paid with respect to the products it purchased
from the Company, and then remit the refunded amount to the Company.
Although the Company is in the process of completing certain regulatory
procedures and is attempting to recover this amount from the customer, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to recover the amount. As of June 30, 2005, the remaining balance of accrued other costs primarily
relates to European tax matters.
Discontinued Operations
In the first six months of 2005 and 2004, SCM incurred net restructuring and other charges
related to discontinued operations of approximately $0.1 and $0.8 million, respectively.
9
Table of Contents
Accrued liabilities related to restructuring actions and other activities during the first two
quarters of 2005 and during the year ended December 31, 2004 consist of the following (in
thousands):
| Asset | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease/Contract | Write | Other | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commitments | Downs | Severance | Costs | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balances as of January 1, 2004 |
$ | 3,912 | $ | 9 | $ | 275 | $ | 345 | $ | 4,541 | ||||||||||
Provision for 2004 |
43 | 22 | 7 | 826 | 898 | |||||||||||||||
Changes in estimates |
450 | — | (65 | ) | — | 385 | ||||||||||||||
| 493 | 22 | (58 | ) | 826 | 1,283 | |||||||||||||||
Payments or write offs in 2004 |
(445 | ) | (31 | ) | (217 | ) | (867 | ) | (1,560 | ) | ||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2004 |
3,960 | — | — | 304 | 4,264 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for Q1 2005 |
— | — | — | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
Changes in estimates |
5 | — | — | — | 5 | |||||||||||||||
| 5 | — | — | 6 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
Payments or write offs in Q1 2005 |
(182 | ) | — | — | (94 | ) | (276 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balances as of March 31, 2005 |
3,783 | — | — | 216 | 3,999 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for Q2 2005 |
— | — | — | 52 | 52 | |||||||||||||||
Changes in estimates |
(12 | ) | — | — | — | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||
| (12 | ) | — | — | 52 | 40 | |||||||||||||||
Payments or write offs in Q2 2005 |
(170 | ) | — | — | (152 | ) | (322 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balances as of June 30, 2005 |
$ | 3,601 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 116 | $ | 3,717 | ||||||||||
Exit costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 primarily related to changes
in estimates for lease obligations and legal fees. The Company has exited its retail Digital Media
and Video business and does not expect to incur further significant charges during 2005, except for
legal costs relating to the Company’s defense to the complaint filed by DVDCre8. (See Note 12.)
| 8. | Segment Reporting, Geographic Information and Major Customers |
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,
establishes standards for the reporting by public business enterprises of information about
operating segments, products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method for
determining what information to report is based on the way that management organizes the operating
segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The
Company’s chief operating decision maker is considered to be its executive staff, consisting of the
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating
Officer and Executive Vice President,
Sales.
SCM provides secure digital access solutions to original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”)
customers in three markets: Digital TV, PC Security and Flash Media Interface. The executive
staff reviews financial information and business performance along these three business segments.
The Company evaluates the performance of these segments at the revenue and gross margin level. The
Company’s reporting systems do not track or allocate operating expenses or assets by segment. The
Company does not include intercompany transfers between segments for management purposes.
10
Table of Contents
Summary information by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and for the
same periods of 2004 is as follows (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
Digital TV: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 4,503 | $ | 4,446 | $ | 8,541 | $ | 10,325 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
1,239 | (1,369 | ) | 1,692 | 167 | |||||||||||
Gross profit % |
28 | % | (31 | )% | 20 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||
PC Security: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 3,637 | $ | 4,269 | $ | 8,668 | $ | 8,636 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
888 | 1,966 | 2,950 | 3,961 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit % |
24 | % | 46 | % | 34 | % | 46 | % | ||||||||
Flash Media Interface: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 2,101 | $ | 2,796 | $ | 3,814 | $ | 5,780 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
1,130 | 1,121 | 2,249 | 2,995 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit % |
54 | % | 40 | % | 59 | % | 52 | % | ||||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 10,241 | $ | 11,511 | $ | 21,023 | $ | 24,741 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
3,257 | 1,718 | 6,891 | 7,123 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit % |
32 | % | 15 | % | 33 | % | 29 | % | ||||||||
Geographic net revenue is based on selling location. Information regarding revenue by
geographic region is as follows (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
Europe |
$ | 4,622 | $ | 5,213 | $ | 9,324 | $ | 12,299 | ||||||||
United States |
2,559 | 3,928 | 5,728 | 7,274 | ||||||||||||
Asia-Pacific |
3,060 | 2,370 | 5,971 | 5,168 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 10,241 | $ | 11,511 | $ | 21,023 | $ | 24,741 | |||||||||
Customers comprising 10% or greater of the Company’s net revenue are summarized as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
Customer A |
* | 11 | % | 10 | % | 11 | % | |||||||||
| * | Revenue derived from customer represented less than 10% for the period. |
Customers representing 10% or greater of the Company’s accounts receivable are summarized as
follows:
| June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Customer A |
11 | % | * | |||||
Customer B |
* | 18 | % | |||||
Total |
11 | % | 18 | % | ||||
| * | Customer’s accounts receivable represented less than 10% for the periods presented. |
11
Table of Contents
Long-lived assets by geographic location as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, are as
follows (in thousands):
| June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Property and equipment, net: |
||||||||
United States |
$ | 56 | $ | 70 | ||||
Europe |
1,540 | 1,919 | ||||||
Asia-Pacific |
2,174 | 2,608 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 3,770 | $ | 4,597 | ||||
| 9. | Cumulative Adjustment to Interest Income and Other Cumulative Comprehensive Gain |
In July 2005, during a review of the Company’s investment holdings and the calculation of
interest income and unrealized gains and losses on investments, the Company discovered an error in
the recording of the amortization of investment premiums and
discounts and the related interest income and unrealized gain (loss)
on investment. As a result, interest income and unrealized loss on investment during the periods
affected and the balance of unrealized loss included in other
cumulative comprehensive gain have been
overstated. The cumulative overstatement of interest income and unrealized loss on investment
for periods prior to the three months ended June 30, 2005 was approximately $0.3 million. The
effect of the error was not material to any relevant prior period and had the amounts been recorded
correctly in the prior periods, there would have been no effect on reported comprehensive loss or
total stockholder’s equity. To correct this error, the Company recorded the cumulative $0.3
million as a reduction in interest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
and a decrease in unrealized loss on investments with a corresponding $0.3 million increase in
Other Cumulative Comprehensive Gain for the three months
ended June 30, 2005.
| 10. | Commitments |
The Company leases facilities, certain equipment, and automobiles under noncancelable
operating lease agreements. These lease agreements expire at various dates during the next twelve
years.
Purchases for inventories are highly dependent upon forecasts of the customers’ demand. Due
to the uncertainty in demand from customers, the Company may have to change, reschedule, or cancel
purchases or purchase orders from suppliers. These changes may lead to vendor cancellation charges
on these purchases or contractual commitments. As of June 30, 2005, purchase and contractual
commitments were $2.9 million.
The Company provides warranties on certain product sales, which range from twelve to
twenty-four months, and allowances for estimated warranty costs are recorded during the period of
sale. The determination of such allowances requires the Company to make estimates of product return
rates and expected costs to repair or to replace the products under warranty. The Company currently
establishes warranty reserves based on historical warranty costs for each product line combined
with liability estimates based on the prior twelve months’ sales activities. If actual return rates
and/or repair and replacement costs differ significantly from the Company’s estimates, adjustments
to recognize additional cost of sales may be required in future periods.
Components of the reserve for warranty costs for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
were as follows (in thousands):
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Balances at January 1 |
$ | 244 | $ | 326 | ||||
Additions related to sales during the period |
158 | 71 | ||||||
Warranty costs incurred during the period |
(63 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to accruals related to prior period sales |
(200 | ) | (63 | ) | ||||
Balance at June 30 |
$ | 139 | $ | 264 | ||||
| 11. | Related Party Transactions |
During the three months ended June 30, 2004, SCM recognized no revenue from sales to
Conax AS, a company engaged in the development and provision of smart-card based systems. During
the six months ended June 30, 2004, SCM recognized revenue of approximately $0.3 million from sales
to Conax. As of December 31, 2004, no accounts receivable were due from
12
Table of Contents
Conax. Oystein Larsen
served as Executive Vice President, Business Development and New Business of Conax through December
31, 2004 and as a board member of SCM Microsystems until July 2005. Mr. Larsen was not directly
compensated for revenue transactions between the two companies.
| 12. | Legal Proceedings |
From time to time the Company could be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course
of business or could be a defendant in lawsuits. While the outcome of any such claims or other
proceedings can not be predicted with certainty, management expects that any such liabilities, to
the extent not provided for by insurance or otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on
the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In April 2005, Cybercard Corporation (“Cybercard”), a Canadian corporation,
filed a patent infringement claim against the Company in the Southern District of Illinois (Case
No. 05-CV-274-MJR). The claim alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,497,411, entitled
“Telecommunications Card – Access System,” by the Company’s CHIPDRIVE® Smartcard Office product. In
the same lawsuit, Cybercard sued six other defendants. No specific damages have been specified in
the claim. To date, no sales of the allegedly infringing product have been made in the United
States. The Company is investigating the claim, which it expects to vigorously defend, if
necessary, or otherwise resolve, as appropriate, of any allegations of infringement.
In September 2003, we and Pinnacle Systems, Inc. (“Pinnacle’) were served with a
complaint in YOUCre8, Inc. a/k/a DVDCre8, Inc. v. Pinnacle Systems, Inc., Dazzle Multimedia, Inc.,
and SCM Microsystems, Inc. (Superior Court of California, Alameda County Case No. RG03114448). The
complaint was filed by a software company whose software was distributed by Dazzle Multimedia, now
SCM Multimedia (“Dazzle”). The complaint alleges that in connection with our sale of certain assets
of our former Dazzle video products business to Pinnacle, Dazzle breached the Software License
Agreement between the Plaintiff and Dazzle. The complaint further alleges that we and Pinnacle
tortiously interfered with DVDCre8’s commercial relationships, engaged in acts to restrain
competition in the DVD software market, misappropriated DVDCre8’s trade secrets, and engaged in
unfair competition. In December of 2003, Dazzle filed a Cross-Complaint against the Plaintiff
seeking $600,000 in damages for alleged breach of the Software License Agreement between the
Plaintiff and Dazzle. In June of 2004, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint asserting
additional claims against Pinnacle. In July of 2004 and January of 2005, the parties participated
in settlement discussions before a private mediator which were unsuccessful. In March of 2005,
Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint, which dropped contract claims and a claim for
injunctive relief against Pinnacle, as well as the misappropriation of trade secrets claim against
all defendants, and added new allegations against Dazzle and SCM Microsystems, including a claim
for damages in excess of $5.8 million. Trial has been set for
January 20, 2006. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement between SCM and Pinnacle, we and
Pinnacle are seeking indemnification from each other, respectively, for all or part of the damages
and the expenses incurred to defend the Plaintiff’s claims. We believe the claims by DVDCre8 are
without merit and intend to vigorously defend the action, but we cannot predict the final outcome
of this lawsuit, nor accurately estimate the amount of time and resources that we may need to
devote to defending ourselves against it. If we were to be unsuccessful in our defense of this
lawsuit, and if the Plaintiff were to be able to establish substantial damages, we could be forced
to pay an amount, currently unknown, which could have an adverse effect on our business. In
addition, although we believe that we are entitled to indemnification in whole or in part for any
damages and costs of defense and that Pinnacle’s claim for indemnification is without merit, there
can be no assurance that we will be successful on the indemnification claim or recover all or a
portion of any damages assessed or expenses incurred, and we may even be forced to pay Pinnacle an
amount, currently unknown, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
13
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements for purposes of
the safe harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. For example,
statements, other than statements of historical facts regarding our strategy, future operations,
financial position, projected results, estimated revenues or losses, projected costs, prospects,
plans, market trends, competition and objectives of management constitute forward-looking
statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “will,”
“believe,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “project” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. Although we
believe that our expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements that we
make in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results,
performance or achievements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q. While we may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we
specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our expectations change, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise. We also caution you that such forward-looking
statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, not all of which are known to us
or within our control, and that actual events or results may differ materially from those indicated
by these forward-looking statements. We disclose some of the important factors that could cause our
actual results to differ materially from our expectations under the heading “Factors That May
Affect Future Results” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
The following information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q. We also urge readers to review and consider our disclosures describing various factors
that could affect our business, including the disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Factors That May Affect Future
Results” and the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 31, 2005.
Overview
SCM Microsystems designs, develops and sells hardware, software and silicon solutions that
enable people to conveniently and securely access digital content and services, including content
and services that have been protected through digital encryption. We sell our digital access
products into three markets segments: PC Security, Digital TV and Flash Media Interface.
| • | For the PC Security market, we offer smart card reader technology that enables secure access to PCs, networks and physical facilities. | ||
| • | For the Digital TV market, we offer conditional access modules that provide secure decryption for digital pay-TV broadcasts. | ||
| • | For the Flash Media Interface market, we offer digital media readers that are used to transfer digital content to and from various flash media. |
We sell our products primarily to original equipment providers, or OEMs, who typically either
bundle our products with their own solutions, or repackage our products for resale to their
customers. Our OEM customers include: government contractors, systems integrators, large
enterprises and computer manufacturers as well as banks and other financial institutions for our
smart card readers; digital TV operators and broadcasters and conditional access providers for our
conditional access modules; and consumer electronics and photographic equipment manufacturers for
our digital media readers. We sell and license our products through a direct sales and marketing
organization, as well as through distributors, value added resellers and systems integrators
worldwide.
Until the middle of 2003, our operations included a retail Digital Media and Video business
that accounted for approximately half of our sales. We sold this business in the third quarter of
2003, so that we are now solely focused on our core OEM Security business. As a result of this sale
and divestiture, beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we have accounted for the retail
Digital Media and Video business as a discontinued operation.
In our continuing operations, we have experienced a significant drop in revenues in the period
from January 2003 through June 2005, which has resulted in continued operational losses in our
business in recent quarters. This decline in our revenues is primarily related to our Digital TV
product sales, which have been adversely affected by competition since the middle of 2003, as well
as ongoing weakness in the overall digital television market. Sales of our PC Security products
were relatively unchanged in 2004 compared with 2003, and sales for the first six months of 2005
were relatively unchanged compared with the first six months of 2004. We believe that growth in
sales of our PC Security products has been curtailed by the slow pace at which new
14
Table of Contents
smart card
programs reach a stage requiring high volumes, which directly drives demand for our readers. Sales
of our Flash Media Interface products were relatively unchanged in 2004 compared with 2003, but
declined in the first six months of 2005 when we discontinued sales of certain digital media
products. In all three of our primary product segments, sales are dependent on a small number of
customers, which can result in fluctuations in sales levels from one quarter to another.
We have adopted a strategy to address our declining revenue that is based on introducing new
Digital TV and PC Security products to offset the rate of decline of our legacy Digital TV product
sales and to address new market opportunities. To date, this strategy has been only partially
successful. Delays in the certification process for our digital TV security modules in South Korea
have limited shipment of our modules to the Korean digital TV market, which remains an important focus for us. We
have also experienced delays in the development of new products designed to take advantage of new
market opportunities, including our mobile smart card readers, physical access control terminals
and dual reader conditional access modules.
We have taken measures to reduce operating expenses over the last several quarters, including
reducing headcount, reducing the use of outside contract personnel and limiting certain expenses
such as travel. While we have been successful in reducing expenses overall, expense reductions have
been partially offset by the devaluation of the U.S. dollar related to foreign currencies. More
than half of our expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, such as the
euro, Singapore dollar, Indian rupee and Japanese yen. In addition to the unfavorable effect of
foreign currency exchange, in recent periods we have also increased spending on audit and other
services related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
discusses SCM’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates
its estimates and judgments, including those related to product returns, customer incentives, bad
debts, inventories, asset impairment, deferred tax assets, accrued warranty reserves, restructuring
costs, contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical
experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect our more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
| • | We recognize product revenue upon shipment provided that risk and title have transferred, a purchase order has been received, collection is determined to be probable and no significant obligations remain. Maintenance revenue is deferred and amortized over the period of the maintenance contract. Provisions for estimated warranty repairs and returns and allowances are provided for at the time products are shipped. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. | ||
| • | We write down inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual demand or market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. Based on such judgments, we had net inventory writedowns of approximately $0.8 million and $3.1 million in the first six months of 2005 and 2004, respectively. | ||
| • | We record an investment impairment charge when we believe an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investment that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future. In each of the first six months of 2005 and 2004, we recognized no impairment charges related to investments. | ||
| • | In assessing the recoverability of our other intangibles, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets not previously recorded. |
15
Table of Contents
| • | The carrying value of our net deferred tax assets reflects that we have been unable to generate sufficient taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before we are able to realize their benefit, or that future deductibility is uncertain. Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets quarterly. The deferred tax assets are still available for us to use in the future to offset taxable income, which would result in the recognition of a tax benefit and a reduction in our effective tax rate. The divestiture of our retail Digital Media and Video business to Pinnacle Systems and Zio Corporation as well as future changes to the operating structure of our Security business may limit our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets. | ||
| • | We accrue the estimated cost of product warranties during the period of sale. While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers, our warranty obligation is affected by actual warranty costs, including material usage or service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. If actual material usage or service delivery costs differ from our estimates, revisions to our estimated warranty liability would be required. | ||
| • | On January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity initiated after December 31, 2002 be recognized when the liability is incurred and that the liability be measured at fair value. During 2002, the accounting for restructuring costs required us to record provisions and charges when we had a formal and committed plan. In connection with plans we had adopted, we recorded estimated expenses for severance and outplacement costs, lease cancellations, asset write-offs and other restructuring costs. We continually evaluate the adequacy of the remaining liabilities under our restructuring initiatives. Although we believe that these estimates accurately reflect the costs of our restructuring plans, actual results may differ, thereby requiring us to record additional provisions or reverse a portion of such provisions. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123R is a revision
of SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB Opinion 25. SFAS No. 123R eliminates the alternative of applying
the intrinsic value measurement provisions of APB Opinion 25 to stock compensation awards issued to
employees. Rather, the new standard requires enterprises to measure the cost of employee services
received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the
award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide
services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting
period).
We have not yet quantified the effects of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, but it is expected
that the new standard may result in significant stock-based compensation expense. The actual
effects of adopting SFAS No. 123R will be dependent on numerous factors including, but not limited
to, the valuation model that we choose to value stock-based awards; the assumed award forfeiture
rate; the accounting policies adopted concerning the method of recognizing the fair value of awards
over the requisite service period; and the transition method (as described below) chosen for
adopting SFAS No. 123R.
As a result of a decision by the Securities and Exchange Commission to delay the
effective date of SFAS No. 123R, SFAS No. 123R will be effective for our fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2006. SFAS 123R requires the use of the Modified Prospective Application Method. Under
this method SFAS No. 123R is applied to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or
cancelled after the effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards for
which the requisite service has not been rendered (such as unvested options) that are outstanding
as of the date of adoption shall be recognized as the remaining services are rendered. The
compensation cost relating to unvested awards at the date of adoption shall be based on the
grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro forma disclosures under the original
SFAS No. 123. In addition, companies may use the Modified Retrospective Application Method. This
method may be applied to all prior years for which the original SFAS No. 123 was effective or only
to prior interim periods in the year of initial adoption. If the Modified Retrospective Application
Method is applied, financial statements for prior periods shall be adjusted to give effect to the
fair-value-based method of accounting for awards on a consistent basis with the pro forma
disclosures required for those periods under the original SFAS No. 123.
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of
APB Opinion 29. SFAS No. 153 eliminates certain differences between existing accounting standards.
This standard is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning
after June, 15, 2005. We do not expect adoption of this standard to have a material
impact on our future results of operations and financial position.
16
Table of Contents
In November 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs. SFAS No. 151 clarifies the
accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted
material (spoilage). SFAS No. 151 requires that these items be recognized as current period
charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to
inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Unallocated overheads must be
recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. SFAS No. 151 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We are evaluating the impact of the adoption of
the new standard on our future results of operations and financial position.
In March 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-01, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (“EITF No. 03-01”). EITF
No. 03-01 provides guidance on recording other-than-temporary impairments of cost method
investments and disclosures about unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt and equity
securities accounted for under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities. The guidance for evaluating whether an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired
should be applied in other-than-temporary impairment evaluations made in reporting periods
beginning after June 15, 2004. The additional disclosures for cost method investments are effective
for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. For investments accounted for under SFAS No. 115, the
disclosures are effective in annual financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2003. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on
our consolidated
balance sheet or statement of operations.
Results of Operations
Net Revenue. Summary information by product segment for the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows (in thousands):
| % change | % change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended | period to | Six months ended | period to | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, | period | June 30, | period | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Digital TV |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 4,503 | $ | 4,446 | 1 | % | $ | 8,541 | $ | 10,325 | (17 | )% | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
1,239 | (1,369 | ) | 1,692 | 167 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit % |
28 | % | (31 | )% | 20 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
PC Security |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 3,637 | $ | 4,269 | (15 | )% | $ | 8,668 | $ | 8,636 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
888 | 1,966 | 2,950 | 3,961 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit % |
24 | % | 46 | % | 34 | % | 46 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Flash Media Interface |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 2,101 | $ | 2,796 | (25 | )% | $ | 3,814 | $ | 5,780 | (34 | )% | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
1,130 | 1,121 | 2,249 | 2,995 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit % |
54 | % | 40 | % | 59 | % | 52 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 10,241 | $ | 11,511 | (11 | )% | $ | 21,023 | $ | 24,741 | (15 | )% | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
3,257 | 1,718 | 6,891 | 7,123 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit % |
32 | % | 15 | % | 33 | % | 29 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $10.2 million, compared to $11.5
million for the same period in 2004, a decrease of 11%. This decrease in revenue resulted from
lower sales of our Flash Media Interface and PC Security products, while sales levels of our
Digital TV products remained unchanged. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, net revenue was
$21.0 million, down 15% from revenue of $24.7 million in the first six months of 2004. The decrease
in revenue in the six month period resulted from lower sales of our Flash Media Interface and
Digital TV products, while sales levels of our PC Security products remained unchanged.
Revenue from our Flash Media Interface product line decreased 25% to $2.1 million in the
second quarter of 2005 from $2.8 million in the second quarter of 2004. This decrease was primarily
due to the cessation of sales of certain products within this business, as well as lower sales
related to the timing of orders. In addition, sales were also adversely impacted by delays in
shipments of a newly released product. For the first six months of 2005, sales
17
Table of Contents
were $3.8 million, a
decrease of 34% compared with $5.8 million in the first six months of 2004. The decrease in the
six-month comparative period was primarily due to the cessation of certain products within this
business. Flash Media Interface revenues consist of sales of digital media readers to provide an
interface for flash memory cards in computer printers and digital photography kiosks, which are
used to download and print digital photos.
In our Digital TV product line, sales in the second quarter of 2005 were $4.5 million,
relatively unchanged from sales of $4.4 million in the second quarter of 2004. For the first six
months of 2005, sales were $8.5 million, a decrease of 17% compared with $10.3 million in the first
six months of 2004. This decrease was primarily the result of weaker demand and greater competition
for our products, primarily in Europe, offset slightly by increased sales of new products in Asia.
Beginning in the third quarter of 2003 and continuing through the second quarter of 2005, our
Digital TV products sales have been significantly adversely impacted by competition from suppliers
that have emulated the conditional access decryption software for pay-TV content on conditional
access modules that may be used to provide unauthorized access to that content (further discussed
in “Factors that May Affect Operating Results – Our Markets are highly competitive, and our
customers may purchase products from our competitors.”). We have pursued, and in some cases have
obtained, legal injunctions against these suppliers. However, we do not expect to be able to regain
the market share we have lost. The majority of our Digital TV sales come from shipments of
conditional access modules, which are used in conjunction with set-top boxes or integrated digital
televisions to decrypt digital pay-television broadcasts.
In our PC Security product line, sales were $3.6 million in the second quarter of 2005, a
decrease of 15% from sales of $4.3 million in the second quarter of 2004. Revenue in this product
line is subject to significant variability based on the size and timing primarily of product orders. In the
second quarter of 2005 we experienced significantly lower sales in the U.S. compared with the prior
year period due to the timing of orders for smart card readers for U.S. government security
projects, as well as continued competition for business in Europe based on price. For the first six
months of 2005, sales were $8.7 million, relatively unchanged from $8.6 million in the first six
months of 2004. This product line consists of smart card readers and related chip technology that
are utilized principally in security programs where smart cards are used to identify and
authenticate the identity of people in order to control access to computers, computer networks and buildings or
other facilities.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the second quarter of 2005 was $3.3 million, or 32% of revenue,
compared to $1.7 million, or 15% of revenue in the same period of 2004. During the second quarter
of 2005, our gross profit was adversely affected by approximately $0.3 million of tooling costs for
new chip production, as well as by pricing pressure and the mix of products sold during the
period. In particular, we experienced higher sales of lower margin ASICs as well as price declines
for our conditional access modules in our Digital TV business; we experienced a shift towards
higher volumes of lower margin orders in our PC Security business; and we introduced a new, lower
margin product in Europe and experienced lower sales of higher margin products in the U.S. in our
Flash Media Interface business. During the second quarter of 2004, our gross profit was adversely
affected by an inventory write-down of approximately $2.9 million primarily related to our Digital
TV products. Increasing competition and the sharp decline in demand for our conditional access
modules during the quarter brought into doubt our ability to sell these products, and as a result
we wrote down the value of inventory for components and finished goods.
For the first six months of 2005, gross profit was $6.9 million, or 33% of revenue, compared
with $7.1 million, or 29% of revenue for the prior year period. During the first six months of
2005, gross profit was adversely impacted by approximately $1.9 million related to inventory
write-downs primarily taken during the first quarter of 2005 as well as by pricing pressure, mix of
products sold and tooling costs of $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2005. These inventory
write-downs were partially offset by sales of products that previously had been written down, with
positive effects to cost of sales of $1.1 million. During the first six months of 2004, our gross
profit was adversely affected by the Digital TV inventory write-down of $2.9 million taken in the
second quarter as well as an inventory write-down of $0.2 million taken in the first quarter of
2004, both related primarily to Digital TV products that we determined we could not sell.
Our gross profit has been and will continue to be affected by a variety of factors, including,
without limitation, competition, the volume of sales in any given quarter, product configuration
and mix, the availability of new products, product enhancements, software and services, and the
cost and availability of components. Accordingly, gross profit percentages are expected to
continue to fluctuate from period to period.
18
Table of Contents
Research and Development.
| % change | % change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended June 30 | period to | Six months ended June 30 | period to | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | period | 2005 | 2004 | period | |||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
$ | 2,276 | $ | 2,797 | (19 | )% | $ | 4,725 | $ | 5,553 | (15 | )% | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenues |
22 | % | 24 | % | 22 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and fees for the
development of prototype products. Research and development costs are primarily related to hardware
and chip development. For the second quarter of 2005, research and development expenses were $2.3
million, or 22% of revenue, compared with $2.8 million, or 24% of revenue in the second quarter of
2004. For the first six months of 2005, research and development expenses were $4.7 million, or 22%
of revenue, compared with $5.6 million, or 22% of revenue for the first six months of 2004. The
decrease of $0.8 million in the first six months of 2005 compared with the prior year period was
primarily due to lower headcount and contract service costs and to a customer funded development
contribution of $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2005. The decrease in expenses was partially
offset by the devaluation of the U.S. dollar compared with foreign currencies in which all of our
research and development expenses are paid. We expect our research and development expenses to vary
based on future project demands.
Selling and Marketing.
| % change | % change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended June 30 | period to | Six months ended June 30 | period to | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | period | 2005 | 2004 | period | |||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
$ | 2,629 | $ | 3,054 | (14 | )% | $ | 5,064 | $ | 6,372 | (21 | )% | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenues |
26 | % | 27 | % | 24 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of employee compensation as well as tradeshow
participation and other marketing costs. Selling and marketing expenses in the second quarter of
2005 were $2.6 million, or 26% of revenue, compared with $3.1 million, or 27% of revenue in the
second quarter of 2004. For the first six months of 2005, sales and marketing expenses were $5.1
million, a decrease of 21% from $6.4 million in the first six months of 2004. The decrease of $1.3
million in the first six months of 2005 compared with the prior year period was primarily due to
reductions in headcount and in trade show expenditures, partially offset by the devaluation of the
U.S. dollar compared with foreign currencies in which the majority of our sales and marketing
expenses are paid. We expect our sales and marketing costs will vary as we continue to align our
resources to address existing and new market opportunities.
General and Administrative.
| % change | % change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended June 30 | period to | Six months ended June 30 | period to | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | period | 2005 | 2004 | period | |||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
$ | 2,288 | $ | 2,949 | (22 | )% | $ | 4,759 | $ | 5,774 | (18 | )% | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenues |
22 | % | 26 | % | 23 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation expenses for employees
performing our administrative functions, professional fees arising from legal, auditing and other
consulting services and charges for allowances for doubtful accounts receivable. In the second
quarter of 2005, general and administrative expenses were $2.3 million, or 22% of revenue, compared
with $2.9 million, or 26% of revenue in the second quarter of 2004. For the first six months of
2005, general and administrative expenses were $4.8 million, compared with $5.8 million in the
first six months of 2004. The decrease of $1.0 million in the first six months of 2005 compared
with the prior year period was primarily due to reductions in headcount, partially offset by
increased spending on audit and other services related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and by the devaluation of the U.S. dollar compared with foreign currencies in which the
majority of our general and administration expenses are paid. We expect that our general and
administrative costs will remain high as a percentage of revenue relative to other companies our
size, as our global operations make it necessary to maintain our current business infrastructure.
Amortization of Goodwill and Intangibles.
| % change | % change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended June 30 | period to | Six months ended June 30 | period to | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | period | 2005 | 2004 | period | |||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
$ | 174 | $ | 290 | (40 | )% | $ | 350 | $ | 593 | (41 | )% | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenues |
2 | % | 3 | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
19
Table of Contents
Amortization of intangible assets in the second quarter of 2005 was $0.2 million, compared
with $0.3 million for the same period of 2004. For the first six months of 2005, amortization of
intangible assets was $0.4 million, down 41% from $0.6 million for the first six months of 2004.
Restructuring and Other Charges (Credits). We recorded restructuring and other credits of
$26,000 in the second quarter of 2005 and for the six months ended June 30, 2005, we recorded
restructuring and other charges of $0.2 million primarily related to changes in estimates for
European tax related matters. In the second quarter of 2004, we recorded a credit to restructuring
and other charges of $0.1 million for the adjustment of charges taken in 2003 related to European
taxation issues. In the first six months of 2004, we recorded a gain to restructuring and other
charges of $58,000, which reflects the adjustment noted above, offset by charges related to a legal
settlement and associated legal costs taken in the first quarter of 2004.
Interest and Other Income: Interest and other income consists of interest earned on invested
cash, other income net of other expense and foreign currency gains or losses. In the second quarter
of 2005, we recorded an adjustment to interest income for the correction of an error in accounting
for the amortization of premiums and discounts on investments. The cumulative correction of the error resulted in a reduction of interest income
in the second quarter of 2005 of approximately $0.3 million. (See Note 9 to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional discussion of this adjustment). In the second quarter of 2004,
we recorded interest income of $0.2 million. In the first six
months of 2005, interest income, including the reduction of
$0.3 million for the correction referred to above, was
$0.2 million compared to $0.3 million in the first six months of 2004. Foreign currency
transaction gains and other income were $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2005, compared with
$0.2 million in the second quarter of 2004. In the first six months of 2005, foreign currency
transaction gains and other income were $1.4 million compared to $0.5 million in the first six
months of 2004. Gains in both the second quarter and the first six months of 2005 and 2004 were
primarily a result of exchange rate movements between the U.S. dollar and the euro. The gains in
2005 resulted primarily from the revaluation of dollar holdings in an entity where the euro is the
functional currency, while the gains in 2004 resulted primarily from the revaluation of U.S.
denominated intercompany balances to the functional currency of the subsidiary.
Income Taxes. We recorded tax benefits of $90,000 and $177,000 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005, respectively. The tax benefits resulted
from the recognition of Research and Development tax credits in foreign
jurisdictions. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded tax provisions of
$10,000 and $126,000 respectively. The provisions for income taxes in 2004 resulted from taxes
payable in foreign jurisdictions which are not offset by operating loss carryforwards.
Discontinued Operations. During 2003, we completed two transactions to sell our retail
Digital Media and Video business. Net revenue for the retail Digital Media and Video business was
$0 in the second quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $0 and $16,000 in the first six months
of 2005 and 2004, respectively. Operating loss was $0.1 million in each of the second quarters of
2005 and 2004 and $0.3 million and $0.1 million in the first six months of 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
During the second quarter of 2005 and 2004, we recorded a net loss on the disposal of the
retail Digital Media and Video business of approximately $40,000 and $35,000, respectively. For the
first six months of 2005 and 2004, we recorded net gains of $15,000 and $62,000, respectively,
primarily resulting from asset recoveries and changes in estimates related to the sale transaction.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2005, our working capital, which we have defined as current assets less current
liabilities, was $32.4 million compared to $39.2 million as of December 31, 2004, a decrease of
approximately $6.8 million. The reduction in working capital for the first six months of 2005
primarily reflects a decrease in accounts receivable of $2.3 million, a decrease in inventory of
$2.2 million and decreases in current liabilities of $7.4 million.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $36.3 million as of June 30, 2005, a
decrease of approximately $9.8 million compared to the balance of $46.2 million as of December 31,
2004.
20
Table of Contents
The following summarizes our cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands):
| Six Months Ended | ||||
| June 30, | ||||
| 2005 | ||||
Operating cash used in continuing operations |
$ | (7,462 | ) | |
Operating cash used in discontinued operations |
(1,059 | ) | ||
Investing cash usage |
(5,621 | ) | ||
Financing cash flow |
158 | |||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(1,448 | ) | ||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(15,432 | ) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
31,181 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 15,749 | ||
Our primary source of cash is receipts from revenue. The primary uses of cash are payroll
(salaries, bonuses, and benefits), general operating expenses (marketing, travel, office rent) and
cost of product revenue. Another source of cash is the proceeds from the exercise of employee
options and participation in the employee stock purchase plan.
During the first six months of 2005, cash used by operating activities was $7.5 million and
reflects a loss from continuing operations of $6.6 million, net of non-cash related expenses. The
primary working capital source of cash was a reduction in accounts receivable of $1.8 million and
decreases in inventory levels of $2.0 million due to lower purchases made during the quarter. These
positive items were primarily impacted by payments of accrued expenses and liabilities of $6.0
million including the payment to the French government of $4.7 million related to Value Added Tax
matters for a former customer. The Company is in the process of
completing certain regulatory procedures in order to seek recovery of this amount from
the customer (see Note 7 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion). Significant commitments that will require the use of cash in future
periods include obligations under operating leases, inventory purchase commitments and other
contractual agreements. Total future lease obligations as of June 30, 2005 were $8.8 million, of
which $2.2 million will be paid over the next 12 months. Inventory purchase commitments and other
contractual obligations as of June 30, 2005 were $2.5 million and $0.4 million respectively.
In the coming months, we expect to continue to use cash to fund operations, and we currently
expect that our current capital resources and available borrowings should be sufficient to meet our
operating and capital requirements for the next twelve months. We may, however, seek additional
debt or equity financing prior to that time. There can be no assurance that additional capital will
be available to us on favorable terms or at all. The sale of additional debt or equity securities
may cause dilution to existing stockholders.
Cash used in investing activities was primarily for net purchases of short-term investments of
$5.6 million. Cash provided by financing activities was primarily from the issuance of common stock
related to our Employee Stock Option and Employee Stock Purchase programs of $0.2 million.
21
Table of Contents
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
Our business and results of operations are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and other
factors that you should be aware of, some of which are described below. The risks, uncertainties
and other factors described below are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks,
uncertainties and other factors not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may
also impair our business operations.
If any of the following actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of
operations, cash flows or product market share could be materially adversely affected and the
trading price of our common stock could decline substantially.
We have incurred operating losses and may not achieve profitability.
We have a history of losses with an accumulated deficit of $186.9 million as of June 30, 2005.
We may continue to incur losses in the future and may be unable to achieve or maintain
profitability.
Our quarterly operating results will likely fluctuate.
Our quarterly operating results have varied greatly in the past and will likely vary greatly
in the future depending upon a number of factors. Many of these factors are beyond our control. Our
revenues, gross margins and operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter
due to, among other things:
| • | business and economic conditions overall and in our markets; | ||
| • | the timing and amount of orders we receive from our customers that may be tied to budgetary cycles, product plans or equipment roll-out schedules; | ||
| • | cancellations or delays of customer product orders, or the loss of a significant customer; | ||
| • | our backlog and inventory levels; | ||
| • | our customer and distributor inventory levels and product returns; | ||
| • | competition; | ||
| • | new product announcements or introductions; | ||
| • | our ability to develop, introduce and market new products and product enhancements on a timely basis, if at all; | ||
| • | our ability to successfully market and sell products into new geographic or customer market segments; | ||
| • | the sales volume, product configuration and mix of products that we sell; | ||
| • | technological changes in the market for our products; | ||
| • | reductions in the average selling prices that we are able to charge due to competition or other factors; | ||
| • | fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar; | ||
| • | the timing and amount of marketing and research and development expenditures; and | ||
| • | costs related to events such as acquisitions, organizational restructuring, litigation and write-off of investments. |
Due to these and other factors, our revenues may not increase or even remain at their current
levels. Because a majority of our operating expenses are fixed, a small variation in our revenues
can cause significant variations in our earnings from quarter to quarter and our operating results
may vary significantly in future periods. Therefore, our historical results may not be a reliable
indicator of our future performance.
It is difficult to estimate operating results prior to the end of a quarter.
We do not typically maintain a significant level of backlog. As a result, revenue in any
quarter depends on contracts entered into or orders booked and shipped in that quarter.
Historically, many of our customers have tended to make a significant portion of their purchases
towards the end of the quarter, in part because they believe they are able to negotiate lower
prices and more favorable terms. This trend makes predicting revenues difficult. The timing of
closing larger orders increases the risk of quarter-to-quarter fluctuation. If orders forecasted
for a specific group
of customers for a particular quarter are not realized or revenues are not otherwise
recognized in that quarter, our operating results for that quarter could be materially adversely
affected.
22
Table of Contents
Our strategy to grow revenue and become profitable depends on our ability to identify and secure
new customers and market opportunities at a faster rate than the rate of decline in our sales from
legacy customers and products.
For the last several quarters, sales of our legacy Digital TV products have been significantly
lower than in previous periods, primarily due to competition for our traditional customer base. We
have also experienced little or no growth in sales of our PC Security products, due to the slow
pace of large digital security projects which could utilize our products. We have adopted a
strategy to address our declining revenue that is based on introducing new Digital TV and PC
Security products to offset the rate of decline of our legacy Digital TV product sales and to
address new market opportunities. To date, this strategy has been only partially successful. Delays
in the certification process for our digital TV security modules in South Korea have limited
shipment of our modules to the South Korean digital TV market, which remains an important focus for us. We have also experienced
delays in the development of new products designed to take advantage of new market opportunities,
including our mobile smart card readers, physical access control terminals and dual reader
conditional access modules. Once available, our physical access control product for the U.S.
government faces substantial competition, and there is no guarantee that we will be successful in
securing a significant portion of this market opportunity. If we are not able to complete, sell and
ship new products into the new markets we have identified, we may not be able to counter our
revenue decline and our losses could increase.
Our listing on the Prime Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange exposes our stock price to
additional risks of fluctuation.
Our common stock is listed both on the Prime Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and on
the Nasdaq Stock Market and we currently experience a significant volume of our trading on the
Prime Standard. Because of this, factors that would not otherwise affect a stock traded solely on
the Nasdaq Stock Market may cause our stock price to fluctuate. For example, investors outside the
United States may react differently and more negatively than investors in the United States to
events such as acquisitions, one-time charges and lower than expected revenue or earnings
announcements. Any negative reaction by investors in Europe to such events could cause our stock
price to decrease significantly. The European economy and market conditions in general, or
downturns on the Prime Standard specifically, regardless of the Nasdaq Stock Market conditions,
could negatively impact our stock price. In addition, our inclusion or removal from European stock
indices could impact our stock trading patterns and price.
Our stock price has been and is likely to remain volatile.
Over the past few years, the Nasdaq Stock Market and the Prime Standard of the Frankfurt
Exchange have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected
the market prices of the stocks of technology companies. For example, during the 12-month period
from July 30, 2004 to July 29, 2005, the closing prices for our common stock on the Nasdaq Stock
Market ranged between $2.51 and $4.92 per share. Volatility in our stock price on either or both
exchanges may result from a number of factors, including, among others:
| • | variations in our or our competitors’ financial and/or operational results; | ||
| • | the fluctuation in market value of comparable companies in any of our markets; | ||
| • | expected or announced relationships with other companies; | ||
| • | comments and forecasts by securities analysts; | ||
| • | trading patterns of our stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market or Prime Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange; | ||
| • | the inclusion or removal of our stock from market indices, such as groups of technology stocks or other indices; | ||
| • | any loss of key management; | ||
| • | announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors; | ||
| • | litigation developments; and | ||
| • | general market downturns. |
In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock
have been the object of securities class action litigation. If we were the object of securities
class action litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s
attention and resources.
23
Table of Contents
A significant portion of our sales comes from a small number of customers and the loss of one of
more of these customers could negatively impact our operating results.
Our products are generally targeted at OEM customers in the consumer electronics, digital
photography, computer and conditional access system industries, as well as digital television
operators, broadcasters and distributors, the government sector and corporate enterprises. Sales to
a relatively small number of customers historically have accounted for a significant percentage of
our total revenues. For example, three customers accounted for approximately 19% of our total net
revenue in the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and three customers accounted for
approximately 26% of our total net revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2005. Any additional
consolidation of our business lines could further increase our dependence on a limited number of
customers. We expect that sales of our products to a relatively small number of customers will
continue to account for a high percentage of our total sales for the foreseeable future. The loss
or reduction of orders from a significant customer, including those due to product performance
issues, changes in customer buying patterns, or market, economic or competitive conditions in our
market segments, could result in decreased revenues and/or inventory or receivables write-offs and
otherwise harm our business and operating results.
Sales of our products depend on the development of several emerging product markets.
We sell our products primarily to emerging product markets that have not yet reached a stage
of mass adoption or deployment. If demand for products in these markets does not develop further
and grow sufficiently, our revenue and gross profit margins could decline or fail to grow. We
cannot predict the future growth rate, if any, or size or composition of the market for any of our
products. The demand and market acceptance for our products, as is common for new technologies, is
subject to high levels of uncertainty and risk and may be influenced by several factors, including,
but not limited to, the following:
| • | general economic conditions; | ||
| • | the slow pace and uncertainty of adoption in Europe and Asia of open systems digital television platforms that require conditional access modules, such as ours, to decrypt pay-TV broadcasts; | ||
| • | the strength of entrenched security and set-top receiver suppliers in the United States who may resist the use of removable conditional access modules, such as ours, and prevent or delay opening the U.S. digital television market to greater competition; | ||
| • | the adoption and/or continuation of industry or government regulations or policies requiring the use of products such as our conditional access modules or smart card readers; | ||
| • | the timing of adoption of smart cards by the U.S. government, European banks and other enterprises for large scale security programs beyond those in place today; | ||
| • | the ability of financial institutions, corporate enterprises and the U.S. government to agree on industry specifications and to develop and deploy smart card-based applications that will drive demand for smart card readers such as ours; and | ||
| • | the ability of high capacity flash memory cards to drive demand for digital media readers, such as ours, that enable rapid transfer of large amounts of data, for example digital photographs. |
Our products may have defects, which could damage our reputation, decrease market acceptance of our
products, cause us to lose customers and revenue and result in liability to us, including costly
litigation.
Products such as our conditional access modules and smart card readers may contain defects for
many reasons, including defective design, defective material or software interoperability issues.
Often, these defects are not detected until after the products have been shipped. If any of our
products contain defects or perceived defects or have reliability, quality or compatibility
problems or perceived problems, our reputation might be damaged significantly, we could lose or
experience a delay in market acceptance of the affected product or products and we might be unable
to retain existing customers or attract new customers. In addition, these defects could interrupt
or delay sales or our ability to recognize revenue for products shipped could be impacted. In the
event of a defect or other problem or a perceived defect or problem, we may have to invest
significant capital, technical, managerial and other resources to investigate and correct the
potential defect or problems and potentially divert these resources from other development efforts.
If we are unable to provide a solution to the potential defect or problem that is acceptable to our
customer, we may be required to incur substantial product recall, repair or replacement or even
litigation costs. These costs could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating
results.
In addition, because the majority of our customers rely on our digital security products to
prevent unauthorized access to their digital information, a malfunction of or design defect in our
products (or even a perceived defect) could result in legal or warranty claims against us for
damages resulting from security breaches. If such claims are adversely decided against us, the
potential liability could be substantial and have a material adverse effect on our business and
operating results. Furthermore, the publicity
24
Table of Contents
associated with any such claim, whether or not
decided against us, could adversely affect our reputation. In addition, a well-publicized security
breach involving smart card-based and other security systems could adversely affect the market’s
perception of products like ours in general, or our products in particular, regardless of whether
the breach is actual or attributable to our products. Any of the foregoing events could cause
demand for our products to decline, which would cause our business and operating results to suffer.
If we do not achieve our targeted levels of revenues or anticipate the correct mix of products that
will be sold, we may be required to record further charges related to excess inventories.
Due to the unpredictable nature of the demand for our products, we are required to place
orders with our suppliers for components, finished products and services in advance of actual
customer commitments to purchase these products. Significant unanticipated fluctuations in demand
could result in costly excess production or inventories. If we were to determine that we could not
utilize or sell this inventory, we may be required to write down its value. In order to minimize
the negative financial impact of excess production, we may be required to significantly reduce the
sales price of the product to increase demand, which in turn could result in a reduction in the
value of the original inventory purchase. Writing down inventory or reducing product prices could
adversely impact our cost of revenues and financial condition.
We have paid taxes related to products previously purchased by a customer for which we may not
receive reimbursement.
In order to resolve tax liabilities related to products that we previously sold to a Digital
TV customer, in April 2005 we were required to pay the French government approximately $4.7 million in
Value Added Taxes (VAT), for which we had previously accrued the
expense. In connection with this
payment, we entered into an agreement with the customer that commits the customer to seek a refund
from the French government for the VAT paid with respect to the products it purchased from us and
then remit the refunded amount to us. While the intent of the agreement is to facilitate our
recovery of some or all of the $4.7 million in VAT we have paid to the French government, there is no
assurance that the customer will pursue the tax reimbursement, that the French
government will agree to make a refund to the customer or that the customer will remit to us the
amount refunded; in each case, in a timely fashion, in full or at all. Any legal option that may be available to us in order to pursue reimbursement from the customer could result in significant expense, use our management’s time and resources and may
not be successful.
We rely heavily on our strategic relationships.
If we are unable to anticipate market trends and the price, performance and functionality
requirements for our products, we may not be able to develop and sell products that are
commercially viable and widely accepted. We must collaborate closely with our customers, suppliers
and other strategic partners to ensure that critical development, marketing and distribution
projects proceed in a coordinated manner. Also, this collaboration is important because these
relationships increase our exposure to information necessary to anticipate trends and plan product
development. If any of our current relationships terminate or otherwise deteriorate, or if we are
unable to enter into future alliances that provide us with comparable insight into market trends,
our product development and marketing efforts may be adversely affected, and we could lose sales.
Our business could suffer if we or our third-party manufacturers cannot meet production
requirements.
Most of our products are manufactured outside the United States, either by us or by contract
manufacturers. Any significant delay in our ability to obtain adequate supplies of our products
from our current or alternative sources would materially and adversely affect our business and
operating results. Our reliance on foreign manufacturing poses a number of risks, including, but
not limited to:
| • | difficulties in staffing; | ||
| • | currency fluctuations; | ||
| • | potentially adverse tax consequences; | ||
| • | unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; | ||
| • | tariffs and other trade barriers; | ||
| • | political and economic instability; | ||
| • | lack of control over the manufacturing process and ultimately over the quality of our products; |
25
Table of Contents
| • | late delivery of our products, whether because of limited access to our product components, transportation delays and interruptions, difficulties in staffing, or disruptions such as natural disasters; | ||
| • | capacity limitations of our manufacturers, particularly in the context of new large contracts for our products, whether because our manufacturers lack the required capacity or are unwilling to produce the quantities we desire; and | ||
| • | obsolescence of our hardware products at the end of the manufacturing cycle. |
In addition, in the third quarter of 2005 we plan to begin shifting all product and component
manufacturing to contract manufacturers, while continuing to manage demand planning, procurement
and other related activities within SCM. The exclusive use of contract manufacturing reduces the
flexibility we have in our operations and requires us to exercise strong planning and management
skills in order to ensure that our products are manufactured timely, to correct specifications and
to a high standard of quality. If any of our contract manufacturers cannot meet our production
requirements, we may be required to rely on other contract manufacturing sources or identify and
qualify new contract manufacturers. Despite efforts to do so, we may be unable to identify or
qualify new contract manufacturers in a timely manner or at all or on reasonable terms and these
new manufacturers may not allocate sufficient capacity to us in order to meet our requirements. In
addition, if we are not successful at managing the contract manufacturing process, the quality of
our products could be jeopardized or inventories could be too low or too high, which could result
in damage to our reputation with our customers and in the marketplace, as well as write-offs of
excess inventory.
Our future success will depend on our ability to keep pace with technological change and meet the
needs of our target markets and customers.
The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technology and the need to
meet market requirements and to differentiate our products through technological enhancements, and
in some cases, price. Our customers’ needs change, new technologies are introduced into the market,
and industry standards are still evolving. As a result, product life cycles are short, and
frequently we must develop new products quickly in order to remain competitive in light of new
market requirements. Rapid changes in technology, or the adoption of new industry standards, could
render our existing products obsolete and unmarketable. If a product is deemed to be obsolete or
unmarketable, then we might have to reduce revenue expectations or write off inventories for that
product. For example, in the first quarter of 2005 we determined that we might no longer be able to
sell certain of our Digital TV and PC Security products because they contain lead, which will be
banned from use in electronic and electrical products in Europe beginning in July 2006 under the
directive known as RoHS (Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and
Electronic Equipment), which will come into force on July 1, 2006. As a result, we wrote down
Digital TV and PC Security product inventory in the first quarter. In addition, we must now submit
new lead-free products to our customers, which may result in a vendor qualification process that
could require us to compete for business that had previously been secured.
Our future success will depend upon our ability to enhance our current products and to develop
and introduce new products with clearly differentiated benefits that address the increasingly
sophisticated needs of our customers and that keep pace with technological developments, new
competitive product offerings and emerging industry standards. For example, we are beginning to
bring to market a line of smart card readers designed to provide secure physical access to U.S.
government buildings and other facilities. Industry specifications and market requirements for
physical access are still evolving and competition for this market is already well established. We
must be able to demonstrate that our products have features or functions that are clearly
differentiated from existing or anticipated competitive offerings, or we may be unsuccessful in
selling these products. In addition, in cases where we are selected to supply products based on
features or capabilities that are still under development, we must be able to complete our product
design and delivery process on a timely basis, or risk losing current and any future revenue from
those products.
In some cases, we depend upon partners who provide one or more components of the overall
solution for a customer in conjunction with our products. If our partners do not adapt their
products and technologies to new market or distribution requirements, or if their products do not
work well, then we may not be able to sell our products into certain markets.
Because we operate in markets for which industry-wide standards have not yet been fully set,
it is possible that any standards eventually adopted could prove disadvantageous to or incompatible
with our business model and product lines. For example, authentication tokens other than smart
cards, such as USB tokens, could become a preferred solution for secure network or business access.
If any of the standards supported by us do not achieve or sustain market acceptance, our business
and operating results would be materially and adversely affected.
26
Table of Contents
Our markets are highly competitive.
The markets for our products are intensely competitive and characterized by rapidly changing
technology. We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting the markets for our
products include:
| • | the extent to which products must support existing industry standards and provide interoperability; | ||
| • | the extent to which standards are widely adopted and product interoperability is required within industry segments; | ||
| • | the extent to which products are differentiated based on technical features, quality and reliability, ease of use, strength of distribution channels and price; and | ||
| • | the ability of suppliers to develop new products quickly to satisfy new market and customer requirements. |
We currently experience competition from a number of companies in each of our target market
segments and we believe that competition in our markets is likely to intensify as a result of
increasing demand for secure digital access products. We may not be successful in competing against
offerings from other companies, and could lose business as a result.
In our Digital TV business, we are adversely affected by competition from companies that
provide conditional access modules using unlicensed, emulated conditional access decryption
systems. We have lost and will likely continue to lose business to these competitors and their
presence causes us to implement more costly anti-piracy mechanisms on our own products to prevent
their unlicensed use.
We also experience indirect competition from certain of our customers who currently offer
alternative products or are expected to introduce competitive products in the future. For example,
we sell our products to many OEMs who incorporate our products into their offerings or who resell
our products in order to provide a more complete solution to their customers. If our OEM customers
develop their own products to replace ours, this would result in a loss of sales to those customers
as well as increased competition for our products in the marketplace. In addition, these OEM
customers could cancel outstanding orders for our products, which could cause us to write down
inventory already designated for those customers. We may in the future face competition from these
and other parties that develop digital data security products based upon approaches similar to or
different from those employed by us. In addition, the market for digital information security and
access control products may ultimately be dominated by approaches other than the approach marketed
by us.
Many of our current and potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical,
marketing, purchasing and other resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be able to
respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies or standards and to changes in customer
requirements. Our competitors may also be able to devote greater resources to the development,
promotion and sale of products and may be able to deliver competitive products at a lower end user
price. Current and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative
relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products to
address the needs of our prospective customers. Therefore, new competitors, or alliances among
competitors, may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share. Increased competition is
likely to result in price reductions, reduced operating margins and loss of market share.
Sales of smart card readers to the U.S. government could be impacted by uncertainty of timelines
and budgetary allocations as well as by the delay of standards for information technology (IT)
projects.
Historically, we have sold a significant proportion of our smart card reader products to the
U.S. government and we anticipate that some portion of our future revenues will also come from the
U.S. government. The timing of U.S. government smart card projects is not always certain. For
example, while the U.S. government has announced plans for several new smart card-based security
projects, none have yet reached a stage of sustained high volume card or reader deployment, in part
due to delays in reaching agreement on specifications for a new federally mandated set of identity
credentials. In addition, government expenditures on IT projects have varied in the past and we
expect them to vary in the future. As a result of shifting priorities in the federal budget and in
Homeland Security, U.S. government spending may be reallocated away from IT projects, such as smart
card deployments. The slowing or delay of government projects for any reason could negatively
impact our sales.
We may have to take back unsold inventory from our customers.
Although our contractual obligations to accept returned products from our distributors and OEM
customers are limited, if demand is less than anticipated, these customers may ask that we accept
returned products that they do not believe they can sell. We may determine that it is in our best
interest to accept returns in order to maintain good relations with our customers. While we have
experienced few product returns to date, returns may increase beyond present levels in the future.
Once these products have been returned, we may be required to take additional inventory reserves to
reflect the decreased market value of slow-selling returned inventory, even if the products are in
good working order.
27
Table of Contents
Our inability to achieve a quorum and to hold an annual meeting of stockholders could result in
stockholder lawsuits under Delaware law and/or the delisting of our common stock from the Nasdaq
National Market.
Our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was originally scheduled for June 23, 2005. However,
we have had to adjourn this meeting twice because we have been unable to achieve a quorum.
Currently, the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders has been adjourned
to October 20, 2005, in order
to allow us additional time to solicit proxies, and we may be required to further adjourn the
meeting to an even later date or cancel it if we are not able to achieve the necessary quorum.
Our present or future failure to hold an annual meeting of stockholders may result in our
being out of compliance with Delaware law and the Qualitative Listing Requirements for the Nasdaq
National Market, each of which requires us to hold an annual meeting of our stockholders. The
inability to obtain a quorum at any such meeting may not be an adequate excuse for such failure.
In accordance with Section 211 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, if there has been a failure
to hold an annual meeting, the Court of Chancery may order a meeting to be held upon the
application of any stockholder or director. Lack of compliance with the Qualitative Listing
Requirements for the Nasdaq National Market could result in the delisting of our common stock on
the Nasdaq Stock Market. Either of these events would divert management’s attention from our
operations and would likely be costly and could also have an adverse effect on the trading price of
our common stock.
According
to Section 1.4 of our bylaws, at any meeting of the stockholders, holders
of one-third of all shares of stock entitled to vote at the meeting, present in person or by proxy,
shall constitute a quorum. As of April 25, 2005, the record date for our 2005 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, approximately 68% of our shares outstanding were held by retail stockholders in
Germany, through German banks and brokers. German stock market regulations make it voluntary for
German banks and brokers to send proxy materials to the individuals for whom they hold shares in
custody, and, to our understanding, the majority of these banks and brokers do not forward proxy
materials for non-German companies. As a result, we believe that more than half of our stockholders
in Germany have not received, and we do not expect them to receive, proxy materials for our 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Accordingly, these stockholders will not be able to vote their
shares, either in person or by proxy, at such a meeting. In addition, we had a very low turnout of
votes from our German stockholders who did receive copies of our proxy materials. In contrast to
the United States, we understand that there is no routine “broker non-vote” in Germany, so even
when the German banks and brokers do circulate our proxy materials, if the stockholder does not
return the proxy card to us, the stockholder’s shares will not be counted for purposes of
establishing a quorum.
As
of July 21, 2005, the date of our most recently completed
tabulation, only 30.3% of the 15,485,438 shares of our common stock issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date for the
meeting had returned a proxy to us. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in obtaining a quorum for our 2005 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders or for any future meeting of our stockholders.
Future corporate actions requiring stockholder approval may be restricted, delayed or prevented if
we are unable to obtain a quorum at regular or special stockholder meetings or the required
stockholder approval.
As described in the risk factor above, to date we have been unable to achieve a quorum in order to
conduct business at our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Because we expect that a significant
percentage of our shares will continue to be held by retail stockholders in Germany through German
banks and brokers, it will be difficult and costly for us, and will require considerable management
resources, to achieve a quorum at any future annual or special meeting of our stockholders, if we
are able to do so at all. Even if we use every reasonable effort, we cannot assure you that we will
be able to persuade any or all of the German banks and brokers to cooperate in our proxy
solicitation process or, if we do, that we will be successful in obtaining proxies from a
sufficient number of our stockholders to constitute a quorum. If we are unable to achieve a quorum
at a future annual or special meeting of our stockholders, corporate actions requiring stockholder
approval could be restricted, delayed or even prevented. These include, but are not limited to,
actions and transactions that may be of benefit to our stockholders, part of our strategic plan or
necessary for our corporate governance, such as corporate mergers, acquisitions, sales or
reorganizations, financings, stock incentive plans or the election of directors. Even if we are
able to achieve a quorum for a particular meeting, some of these actions or transactions require
the approval of a majority of the total number of our shares then outstanding, and we cannot assure
you that we will be successful in obtaining such approval.
We have global operations, which require significant financial, managerial and administrative
resources.
Our business model includes the management of three separate product lines that address three
disparate market opportunities, which are dispersed geographically. While there is some shared
technology across our products, each product line requires significant research and development
effort to address the evolving needs of our customers and markets. To support our development and
sales efforts, we maintain company offices and business operations in several locations around the
world.
28
Table of Contents
Managing our various development, sales and administrative operations places a significant
burden on our financial systems and has resulted in a level of operational spending that is
disproportionately high compared to our current revenue levels. Based on our business model and
geographic structure, if we do not grow revenues, we will likely not reach profitability.
Operating in diverse geographic locations also imposes significant burdens on our managerial
resources. In particular, our management must:
| • | divert a significant amount of time and energy to manage employees and contractors from diverse cultural backgrounds and who speak different languages; | ||
| • | maintain sufficient internal financial controls in multiple geographic locations that may have different control environments; | ||
| • | manage different product lines for different markets; | ||
| • | manage our supply and distribution channels across different countries and business practices; and | ||
| • | coordinate these efforts to produce an integrated business effort, focus and vision. |
Any failure to effectively manage our operations globally could have a material adverse effect
on our business and operating results.
We conduct the majority of our operations outside the United States. Economic, political,
regulatory and other risks associated with international sales and operations could have an adverse
effect on our results of operation.
We were originally a German corporation and we continue to conduct a substantial portion of
our business in Europe. Approximately 69% and 73% of our revenues for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, were derived from customers
located outside the United States. Because a significant number of our principal customers are
located in other countries, we anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a
substantial portion of our revenues. As a result, a significant portion of our sales and operations
may continue to be subject to risks associated with foreign operations, any of which could impact
our sales and/or our operational performance. These risks include, but are not limited to:
| • | changes in foreign currency exchange rates; | ||
| • | changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic conditions and stability, particularly in emerging markets; | ||
| • | unexpected changes in foreign laws and regulatory requirements; | ||
| • | potentially adverse tax consequences; | ||
| • | longer accounts receivable collection cycles; | ||
| • | difficulty in managing widespread sales and manufacturing operations; and | ||
| • | less effective protection of intellectual property. |
In addition, the ongoing involvement of U.S. military forces in Iraq, coupled with the
possibility of terrorist attacks, could have an adverse effect upon an already weakened world
economy and could cause U.S. and foreign businesses to slow spending on products and services and
to delay sales cycles. The economic uncertainty or other consequences resulting from the current
military action in Iraq could negatively impact consumer as well as business confidence, at least
in the short term.
Our key personnel are critical to our business, and such key personnel may not remain with us in
the future.
We depend on the continued employment of our senior executive officers and other key
management and technical personnel. If any of our key personnel were to leave and not be replaced,
our business could be adversely affected.
We also believe that our future success will depend in large part on our ability to attract
and retain highly qualified technical and management personnel. However, competition for such
personnel is intense. We may not be able to retain our key technical and management employees or to
attract, assimilate or retain other highly qualified technical and management personnel in the
future.
Likewise, as a small, dual-traded company we are challenged to identify, attract and retain
experienced professionals with diverse skills and backgrounds who are qualified and willing to
serve on our Board of Directors. The increased burden of
29
Table of Contents
regulatory compliance under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 creates additional liability and
exposure for directors and financial losses in our business and lack of growth in our stock price
make it difficult for us to offer attractive director compensation packages. If we are not able to
attract and retain qualified board members, our ability to practice a high a level of corporate
governance could be impaired.
We are subject to a lengthy sales cycle and additional delays could result in significant
fluctuations in our quarterly operating results.
Our initial sales cycle for a new customer usually takes a minimum of six to nine months.
During this sales cycle, we may expend substantial financial and managerial resources with no
assurance that a sale will ultimately result. The length of a new customer’s sales cycle depends on
a number of factors, many of which we may not be able to control. These factors include the
customer’s product and technical requirements and the level of competition we face for that
customer’s business. Any delays in the sales cycle for new customers could delay or reduce our
receipt of new revenue and could cause us to expend more resources to obtain new customer wins. If
we are unsuccessful in managing sales cycles, our business could be adversely affected.
We face risks associated with our past and future acquisitions.
A component of our business strategy is to seek to buy businesses, products and technologies
that complement or augment our existing businesses, products and technologies. From time to time
we may buy or make investments in additional complementary companies, products and technologies.
Any acquisition could expose us to significant risks.
Use of Cash or Issuance of Securities
A potential investment is likely to result in the use of our limited cash balances or require
that we issue debt or equity securities to fund the acquisition. Future equity financings would be
dilutive to the existing holders of our common stock. Future debt financings could involve
restrictive covenants that could have an adverse effect on our business operations. There is no
assurance that we would be able to obtain equity or debt financing on favorable terms or at all.
Acquisition Charges
We may incur acquisition-related accounting charges in connection with an acquisition, which
could adversely affect our operating results.
Integration Risks
Integration of an acquired company or technology frequently is a complex, time consuming and
expensive process. The successful integration of an acquisition requires, among other things, that
we:
| • | integrate and train key management, sales and other personnel; | ||
| • | integrate the acquired products into our product offerings both from an engineering and a sales and marketing perspective; | ||
| • | integrate and support pre-existing supplier, distributor and customer relationships; | ||
| • | coordinate research and development efforts; and | ||
| • | consolidate duplicate facilities and functions. |
The geographic distance between the companies, the complexity of the technologies and
operations being integrated, and the disparate corporate cultures being combined may increase the
difficulties of integrating an acquired company or technology. Management’s focus on the
integration of operations may distract attention from our day-to-day business and may disrupt key
research and development, marketing or sales efforts. In addition, it is common in the technology
industry for aggressive competitors to attract customers and recruit key employees away from
companies during the integration phase of an acquisition.
Unanticipated Assumption of Liabilities
If we buy a company, we may have to incur or assume that company’s liabilities, including
liabilities that are unknown at the time of the acquisition.
30
Table of Contents
We have a limited number of suppliers of key components, and may experience difficulties in
obtaining components for which there is significant demand.
We rely upon a limited number of suppliers of several key components of our products, which
may expose us to certain risks including, without limitation, an inadequate supply of components,
price increases, late deliveries and poor component quality. In addition, some of the basic
components we use in our products, such as flash memory for our digital media readers, are in great
demand. This could result in the components not being available to us timely or at all,
particularly if larger companies have ordered more significant volumes of the components or in
higher prices being charged for the components. Disruption or termination of the supply of
components or software used in our products could delay shipments of these products. These delays
could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results and could also damage
relationships with current and prospective customers.
We may be exposed to risks of intellectual property infringement by third parties.
Our success depends significantly upon our proprietary technology. We currently rely on a
combination of patent, copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality agreements and
contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. We seek to protect our software,
documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws, which afford only
limited protection. Although we often seek to protect our proprietary technology through patents,
it is possible that no new patents will be issued, that our proprietary products or technologies
are not patentable or that any issued patent will fail to provide us with any competitive
advantages.
There has been a great deal of litigation in the technology industry regarding intellectual
property rights and from time to time we may be required to use litigation to protect our
proprietary technology. This may result in our incurring substantial costs and there is no
assurance that we would be successful in any such litigation.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to
copy aspects of our products or to use our proprietary information and software without
authorization. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary and
intellectual property rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States. Because
many of our products are sold and a portion of our business is conducted overseas, primarily in
Europe, our exposure to intellectual property risks may be higher. Our means of protecting our
proprietary and intellectual property rights may not be adequate. There is a risk that our
competitors will independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products or design around
patents or other intellectual property rights. If we are unsuccessful in protecting our
intellectual property or our products or technologies are duplicated by others, our business could
be harmed.
Changes to financial accounting standards may affect our results of operations and cause us to
change our business practices.
We prepare our financial statements to conform with generally accepted accounting principles,
or GAAP, in the United States. These accounting principles are subject to interpretation by the
Financial Standards Accounting Board, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the
Securities and Exchange Commission and various other bodies formed to interpret and create
appropriate accounting policies. A change in those policies can have a significant effect on our
reported results and may affect our reporting of transactions completed before a change is
announced. Changes to those rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our
reported financial results or the way we conduct our business. For example, under the recently
issued Financial Accounting Standard Board Statement No. 123R, we will be required to apply certain
expense recognition provisions beginning January 1, 2006 to share-based payments to employees using
the fair value method. This new accounting policy and any other changes in accounting policies in
the future may result in significant accounting charges.
We face costs and risks associated with compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, on an annual basis our management is
required to report on, and our independent auditors are required attest to, the effectiveness of
our internal controls over financial reporting. The process of maintaining and evaluating the
effectiveness of these controls is expensive, time-consuming and requires significant attention
from our management. While we believe that our internal controls are currently effective, we have
found material weakness in the past and we cannot be certain that we will be able to 1) report that
our controls are without material weakness or 2) complete our evaluation of those controls in a
timely fashion. Similarly, we cannot be certain that our auditors will consistently be able to
attest that no material weakness in our controls exists.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls or internal control over
financial reporting, including satisfaction of the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may discover material weaknesses that we would then be required to disclose.
We may not be able to accurately or timely report on our financial results, and we might be subject
to
31
Table of Contents
investigation by regulatory authorities. As a result, the financial position of our business
could be harmed; current and potential future shareholders could lose confidence in the Company
and/or its reported financial results, which may cause a negative effect on the trading price of
our common stock; and we could be exposed to litigation or regulatory proceedings, which may be
costly or divert management attention.
In addition, all internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent
limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to the preparation and presentation of financial statements. Projections of
any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of
compliance with policies or procedures.
We face risks from litigation.
From time to time, we may be subject to litigation, which could include claims regarding
infringement of the intellectual property rights of third parties, product defects,
employment-related claims, and claims related to acquisitions, dispositions or restructurings. Any
claims or litigation may be time-consuming and costly, cause product shipment delays, require us to
redesign our products, require us to accept return of product and write off inventory, or have
other adverse effects on our business. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations and could require us to pay significant monetary damages.
We expect the likelihood of intellectual property infringement and
misappropriation claims to increase as the number of products and competitors in our markets grows
and as we increasingly incorporate third-party technology into our products. For example, in April
2005, Cybercard Corporation filed a claim against SCM and six other defendants alleging patent
infringement by our CHIPDRIVE Smartcard Office product. As a result of infringement claims, we
could be required to license intellectual property from a third party or redesign our products.
Licenses may not be offered when we need them or on acceptable terms. If we do obtain licenses from
third parties, we may be required to pay license fees or royalty payments or we may be required to
license some of our intellectual property to others in return for such licenses. If we are unable
to obtain a license that is necessary for us to manufacture our allegedly infringing products, we
could be required to suspend the manufacture of products or stop our suppliers from using processes
that may infringe the rights of third parties. We may also be unsuccessful in redesigning our
products. Our suppliers and customers may be subject to infringement claims based on intellectual
property included in our products. We have historically agreed to indemnify our suppliers and
customers for patent infringement claims relating to our products. The scope of this indemnity
varies, but may, in some instances, include indemnification for damages and expenses, including
attorney’s fees. We may periodically engage in litigation as a result of these indemnification
obligations. Our insurance policies exclude coverage for third-party claims for patent
infringement.
We are exposed to credit risk on our accounts receivable. This risk is heightened in times of
economic weakness.
We distribute our products both through third-party resellers and directly to certain
customers. A substantial majority of our outstanding trade receivables are not covered by
collateral or credit insurance. While we seek to monitor and limit our exposure to credit risk on
our trade and non-trade receivables, we may not be effective in limiting credit risk and avoiding
losses. Additionally, if the global economy and regional economies deteriorate, one or more of our
customers could experience a weakened financial condition and we could incur a material loss or
losses as a result.
Factors beyond our control could disrupt our operations.
We face a number of potential business interruption risks that are beyond our control. For
example, in past periods, the State of California experienced intermittent power shortages and
interruption of service to some business customers. Additionally, we may experience natural
disasters that could disrupt our business. For example, our corporate headquarters are located near
a major earthquake fault. Power shortages, earthquakes or other disruptions could affect our
ability to report timely financial statements.
Provisions in our agreements, charter documents, Delaware law and our rights plan may delay or
prevent the acquisition of our Company, which could decrease the value of your shares.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or enter into a material transaction with us
without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions include a classified board of
directors and limitations on actions by our stockholders by written consent. Delaware law imposes
some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or
more of our outstanding
common stock. In addition, our board of directors has the right to issue preferred stock
without stockholder approval, which could be used to dilute the stock ownership of a potential
hostile acquirer.
32
Table of Contents
We have adopted a stockholder rights plan. The triggering and exercise of the rights would
cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire SCM on terms or in a
manner not approved by SCM’s Board of Directors, except pursuant to an offer conditioned upon
redemption of the rights. While the rights are not intended to prevent a takeover of SCM, they may
have the effect of rendering more difficult or discouraging an acquisition of SCM that was deemed
to be undesirable by our Board of Directors.
Although we believe the above provisions and the adoption of a rights plan may provide for an
opportunity to receive a higher bid by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our Board of
Directors, these provisions will apply even if the offer were to be considered adequate by some of
our stockholders. Also, because these provisions may be deemed to discourage a change of control,
they could decrease the value of our common stock.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There
has been no significant change in our exposure to market risk during the first
six months of 2005. For discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, contained
in our Annual
Report incorporated by reference in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation as of June 30, 2005, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting
them to material information relating to SCM (including our consolidated subsidiaries)
that is required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls
During the three months ended June 30, 2005, in response to a material weakness in our
internal controls identified by management in connection with our fiscal 2004 audit and related to
the determination and reporting of the provision for income taxes and the related financial
statements disclosures, we reviewed, revised and strengthened our procedures for the calculation of
income tax provisions, including performing additional validation work and involving additional
external advisors. Other than this, there have been no significant
changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The
information set forth in Note 12 of Part 1, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q
is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Our
2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was originally scheduled for
June 23, 2005. However, we have had to adjourn this meeting
twice because we have been unable to achieve a quorum. Currently, the
2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders has been adjourned to
October 20, 2005, in order to allow us additional time to
solicit proxies, and we may be required to further adjourn the
meeting to an even later date or cancel it if we are not able to
achieve the necessary quorum. Accordingly, no action has been taken
on the two proposals scheduled to be acted upon by stockholders at
the annual meeting, specifically:
| • | the reelection of two Class I directors, and |
| • | the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants. |
In
accordance with the SCM's bylaws, all of our Class I directors will
continue to serve as directors of SCM until their respective
successors are elected. Stockholder ratification of the selection of
Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public
accountants is not required by our bylaws or any other applicable
legal requirement, but was submitted to the stockholders for
ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. We expect that
Deloitte & Touche LLP will continue to serve as our independent
registered public accountants, subject to the discretion of our Audit
Committee.
33
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits.
| Exhibit | ||
| Number | Description of Document | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
34
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
| Registrant | ||||
| SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC. | ||||
August 9, 2005
|
By: | /s/ Robert Schneider | ||
| Robert Schneider | ||||
| Chief Executive Officer | ||||
August 9, 2005
|
/s/ Steven L. Moore | |||
| Steven L. Moore | ||||
| Chief Financial Officer and Secretary | ||||
35
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Exhibit No. | Description | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |